This feast was a spectacular treat. Not only was it the Solemn High Mass practised for centuries to nourish the Saints, but was concluded with Solemn Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament, and a procession around the church singing Pange Lingua to which we are familiar from its closing verses, Tantum Ergo, sung at regular Benediction. St Thomas Aquinas provided us with such wonderful hymns, including the sequence Lauda Sion also sung as part of today's Mass.
The purpose of today is clear; to celebrate the wonderful gift of our salvation, present under the simple appearance of bread and wine. This is a similar mystery to that of our own life; our simple flesh and bones, and our humble works and labours, are divinised by God and transformed into beautiful channels of grace and charity. Wendy was particularly moved by reading, again and again, the translation of the words of consecration said by the Priest over the chalice:
This 'mystery of faith', the transubstantiation, has been carefully safeguarded and expounded throughout the centuries in the vehicle Christ established: The One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. The mystery of the Mass, the partaking of Christ's Body and Blood, is one of the hardest mysteries to grasp and believe by others. In fact, when sects break away from the Church it is often this tenet of the Faith which is disregarded and cast away. During the English 'Reformation', the whole practice of the faith, particularly the Missal, was rewritten to eradicate this overarching influence. It is not surprising then, that one of the most controversial things Jesus said was concerning his identity as the Bread of Life (St. John 6:56-67):
TAKE AND DRINK YE ALL OF THIS, FOR THIS IS THE CHALICE OF MY BLOOD, OF THE NEW AND ETERNAL TESTAMENT: THE MYSTERY OF FAITH: WHICH SHALL BE SHED FOR YOU AND FOR MANY UNTO THE REMISSION OF SINS.
"For my flesh is meat indeed: and my blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, abideth in me, and I in him. As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father; so he that eateth me, the same also shall live by me. This is the bread that came down from heaven. Not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead. He that eateth this bread, shall live for ever."
Many therefore of his disciples, hearing it, said: "This saying is hard, and who can hear it?"
But Jesus, knowing in himself, that his disciples murmured at this, said to them: "Doth this scandalize you? If then you shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before? It is the spirit that quickeneth: the flesh profiteth nothing. The words that I have spoken to you, are spirit and life. But there are some of you that believe not."
After this many of his disciples went back; and walked no more with him.
The Epistle is well worth a mention (Corinthians 11:23-29), since the Novus Ordo lectionary only has it once every 3 years (correct me if I'm wrong), and cuts it distinctly short before St. Paul's stronger admonition:
Brethren, I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, that the Lord Jesus, the same night in which he was betrayed, took bread. And giving thanks, broke, and said: Take ye, and eat: this is my body, which shall be delivered for you: this do for the commemoration of me. In like manner also the chalice, after he had supped, saying: This chalice is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as often as you shall drink, for the commemoration of me. For as often as you shall eat this bread, and drink the chalice, you shall shew the death of the Lord, until he come. Therefore whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord. But let a man prove himself: and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of the chalice. For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh judgment to himself, not discerning the body of the Lord.Quite why the last portion is left out of the new lectionary I will leave to the imagination. But surely this is an important part to note? With regards to apologetics, St. Paul would never have spoken this strongly about a merely symbolic act. He is implying sacrilege, which is a worthy consideration in offering fitting worship to the True God, present Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity. In the wider context of what St. Paul was writing to the Corinthian church; their degradation of the Lord's Supper into a common feast put them in a dangerous position before God, resulting in curses such as weakness, infirmity and even death.
i like your reflection..it came to my mind as it often does that how come the lines for confession aren't as long as those at Holy Communion?
ReplyDeleteAre we all of us truly in a permanent state of grace? methinks not!
Where's Fr. Clevely??!!!
ReplyDeleteNice mass btw ;)
Look carefully at the first picture. Andrew: Fr Cleevely is on the far left assuming the ancient and venerable order of "votive-candle bearer" which is only observed for this special feast. It is an order which has since been abolished by the post-vatican II church for being too clerically exclusivist. It is the ultimate example of a bygone ultramontanist age. ;-)
ReplyDeleteFr Philip was also in the Confessional for most of the Mass - as was Fr Gregory - until he took up his post as candle-bearer. The lines might not have been long, but the Sacrament of Penance was available - and availed of by some.
ReplyDeleteOne would hope that Brum Oratory remains ultramontane in taste as they follow the customs of the Roman Oratory - London is more 'Neopolitan' however.
ReplyDeleteThe Oratorians is about as Roman you can get... traditionally.
It's nice to know that some countries still have Copus Christi on Thursday as St. Thomas intended. I hope that someday this tradition is restored in the rest of the Church.
ReplyDeleteYes anonymous there are always Priests in the conessional & as you rightly say some go....
ReplyDeleteLove to know who you are anonymous!
ReplyDelete