Sunday, January 11, 2009

A History?!

It is always best, when one has a television, to plan your viewing wisely and in advance. That is why I was pleased to have bought a TV guide this week to get a bit of a forewarning about the new 8-part series starting tonight on Channel 4, entitled "Christianity: A History". Normally, having seen the title, I would probably tune straight in and see what was on offer. But after looking at the line-up, it is pretty clear as to the motivation of the film-makers.

It is at first glance an interesting format: Eight different presenters look at different aspects of Christianity's turbulent past. But who do they pick? Firstly, to kick-start things, how about British Jew Howard Jacobson? From the short clips on their website, what better way to tar the entire history of Christianity than to start things off with the Jewish perspective. Basically that Jesus was not the son of God at all, but a Jewish teacher who didn't fulfil the prophecies of the Old Testament, and wasn't even born in Bethlehem! Those silly Christians... It seems that all the other episodes seek to portray a similarly one-sided picture of Christianity, and in particular Catholicism.

If this first attack on Christianity hadn't satiated the rampant anti-Christian, then next up we progress onto the Catholic Church: Lapsed Catholic Michael Portillo (right) looks at the role of the Roman Empire and Emperor Constantine and concludes that "once enthroned in a position of power, the church never looked back - and this has been a disaster for Christianity because 'power is for politicians and not for churchmen'".

In episode 4 we have Rageh Omaar: Obviously not content with war correspondance, he bides his time between slating Christian history and exhorting Islam (BBC4's An Islamic History of Europe. Science and Islam is also currently showing). This particular episode promises to show us the evils of the crusades and the way in which they continue today in the minds of many in the Middle East.

Episode 7 has Colin Blakemore, atheistic scientist, ultimately show that Science will one day make religion completely unnecessary. And to really top things off, the series culminates in Cherie Booth (Blair) looking to the future of Catholicism. Please.

Amongst all this I might consider watching the episode by Ann Widdecombe MP (left) looking at the Reformation, and perhaps Theologian Robert Beckford exploring the Dark Ages, and Christianity as the cultural glue that held together England. But I imagine this series ultimately hopes to show that even from eight different perspectives of 'high-profile personalities', Christianity is something to be scoffed at, and that we should do our best to manipulate history to this end.

My conclusion is that mass media and (true) religion do not mix. I would not ask for Christian propoganda to be shown either. I accept the fact that Christ is, and has always been, the ultimate contradiction to the world. Revelation by its nature will always be: it is in Man's lowest places that the Light must "shineth in the darkness". Ultimately, to quote St Paul (to the Ephesians):

To you therefore that believe, he is honour: but to them that believe not, the stone which the builders rejected, the same is made the head of the corner: And a stone of stumbling, and a rock of scandal, to them who stumble at the word, neither do believe, whereunto also they are set. But you are a chosen generation, a kingly priesthood, a holy nation, a purchased people: that you may declare his virtues, who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light: Who in time past were not a people: but are now the people of God. Who had not obtained mercy; but now have obtained mercy.

And thus it is with great satisfaction that I have not tuned into today's programme with Jewish propoganda about Jesus. It is foolish to think that today's Judaism somehow mirrors the religion that Jesus came to fulfil. When the Word was made flesh, it was a turning point for Judaism. Christ had little regard for the hypocrisy of the teachers, but equally did not seek to destroy everything that came before him. Shortly after the Church was born, the temple at Jerusalem was destroyed, and the sacrificial system of the Old Covenant (which should be integral to Judaism) was lost. Only in the New Covenant, and the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, is God's spotless victim offered for the redemption of the world, as prophesised by Malachi:
For from the rising of the sun even to the going down, my name is great among the Gentiles, and in every place there is sacrifice, and there is offered to my name a clean oblation.
It is unlikely that any of these documentaries would look to faithful Christian scholars and historians for input, all in the quest of appeasing the giant consumer culture it is aimed at. I think it best to stick to pure entertainment in the form of Sherlock Holmes and ER.

12 comments:

  1. I watched Howard Jacobson's first programme in this series last night. It was a predictable presentation of the development of anti-semitism from St Paul to the present day, claiming that Jesus was really a Jewish teacher rather than the Son of God. But, as you have clearly stated in your excellent post, what more can be expected from Channel 4? The reason why practising Catholics and Christians should watch these programmes is to counteract the effect they will have on others in deepening inherent anti-Catholic, anti-Christian prejudices. The subject will come up in the workplace and it is essential that a defense should be given to counteract the views expressed by the presenters. Howard Jacobson did not come across as a happy man and I don't believe that this is due to what he described as centuries of prejudice fermented by the Church. He gave the impression of harbouring an innate sense of dissatisfaction with himself and life in general.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Go on Matt - throw the thing out all together: you'll never look back!

    ReplyDelete
  3. It was wise not to tune in!

    I did, and kept watching out of a sense of morbid fascination I suppose. I won't repeat the experiment for the rest of the series though!

    I posted on my own blog about this and the BBC series "around the world in 80 faiths", which is better for being more banal.

    If I may plug my own blog (?!): http://sufferingworld.blogspot.com

    The post about tv programmes: http://sufferingworld.blogspot.com/2009/01/suffering-television.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. I did watch it and unfortunately had to turn it off in anger, ( which is not an emotion I am given to). After a long " exposition" of the anti- semitism supposedly inate in Christianity or more specifically Catholicism, the programme juxtiposed the statement that Pope Benedict had recently, " revived an old Latin Prayer for the conversion of the Jews" with an image of a Concentration Camp.

    ReplyDelete
  5. And thus it is with great satisfaction that I have not tuned into today's programme with Jewish propoganda about Jesus. It is foolish to think that today's Judaism somehow mirrors the religion that Jesus came to fulfil.

    Get with the new ecumenical programme. Remember Jews can tell us that Jesus is not God and that Pius XII should be canonised.

    But God-forbid we pray for their conversion (cf. Good Friday prayer change)

    *rolls eyes*

    ReplyDelete
  6. Go on Matt - throw the thing out all together: you'll never look back!
    Ben: We did throw it out, but actually we did look back. Now we have quite a good free package with our broadband, and can even rent films without leaving the house!

    Seeing the comments, I'm certainly glad we didn't tune in. If I had I suppose I would have been able to give a better critique, but with regards to work colleagues - I don't find myself in idle chat with many of them.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Very well put. True Religion and mass media do not mix. I am coming very close to "throwing the thing out" I know several people who live perfectly well without a TV.
    KP

    ReplyDelete
  8. This is a classic case of rubbishing something without watching it. See The Tablet this week for a review of the series. I am also enjoying Around the world in 80 faiths very much.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The book the Holy Father speaks with a lot in his Jesus of Nazareth ("A Rabbi Talks with Jesus", by Jacob Neusner) is absolutely fascinating. Dig it out on Amazon or abebooks and read it. It might as well be called "A Pharisee Talks with Jesus" - not to call Neusner a Pharisee in the derogatory sense, but in the sense that everything the chap teaching me the Gospel of st Matthew said about the Jews with whom Jesus spoke turns out to be exactly what Neusner thinks. Absolutely fascinating. Read it and lend it to all your friends.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 'I don't find myself in idle chat with any of them.'

    The vocation of the lay apostolate is to live the faith in accordance with the teaching of the Church and to come to the defense of the Church if she is attacked when necessary. The Church is continually criticized in the media and frequently when people are known to be Catholics others take it out on them in the workplace. We are marked men and women. Ignorance about Church teaching and history is widespread and disseminated by programmes such as these. For a practising Catholic to ignore them is like burying his head in the sand. It is essential to know what the enemy is saying in order to counteract it if the opportunity arises. To fail to do so represents a missed opportunity of explaining the truth. Conversation of this kind is anything but idle.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I admire that last commentator's evangelical vigour. But working in the NHS, I have rarely been party to gossip over previous night's TV; it may sound cliché, but we are usually "too busy". At the moment, I have been too busy to make Thursday lunchtime Mass even once in the last 2 months of my new job.

    But after the couple of minutes that it takes to silently and calmly check that someone's heart has stopped beating, I have managed to say the Church's Subvenite with some assisting nurses for a deceased Catholic. I derive far more spiritual satisfaction from that, rather than a heated exchange over coffee.

    Call me a coward, but at least I'm hard-working.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Matt, your job is your vocation (along with being a husband and father). Just do that well and all will be well.
    Well done for saying the subvenite. A far more evangelical witness than mouthing off in the staff room.

    ReplyDelete